arXiv 2011: A Science Odyssey

Comments
Bookmark and Share

As I posted yesterday, I now have a paper (and an account) on arXiv. No, the point of this post is not to gloat (which wouldn’t make any sense because half the people I know already have their own papers out, and the other half are making productive contributions to society). Somehow, I always looked at the process of being “inducted” to arXiv as a big mystery, but it’s really not. I thought I’d explain how the process works.

For starters, there are two ways a person can be associated with arXiv: as a member, or as an author of a preprint. You get a “member account” by simply signing up using the “register” button on the login page. They will ask you for an institutional affiliation, which reflects the fact that the site is designed for academics, but technically anyone can sign up. Then again, there’s no reason to sign up for the site as a “random person”; the only thing your account allows you to do is submit papers, once you get approved as an author.

diagram of the process

Becoming an author, on the other hand, doesn’t actually require any involvement on your part. When a paper is submitted, arXiv generates an “author account” for each name listed in the paper. Actually, “author account” is an exaggeration — it’s not even an account, really nothing more than the name itself. This is done so that you can search for all papers with a particular name in the author list.

But you may notice a problem with this system: when you search for all papers authored by, say, “John Smith,” how do you know that the “John Smith” who wrote paper A is the same “John Smith” who wrote paper B? You don’t, of course. For less common names, there’s a pretty good chance that any time you see the same name it refers to the same person, but there are enough publishing physicists in the world that there is plenty of overlap. Plus, even the same person can publish under different forms of their name, e.g. using a middle initial sometimes but not other times, and that would make them look like multiple people as far as arXiv’s “author accounts” are concerned.

The solution lies in authority records. An authority record is just a link between a “member account” and an “author account.” When you create an authority record, you are telling arXiv who that name on the paper actually refers to. In order to do this, obviously, you need to prove that you’re authorized to use both the member account and the author account. For the former, you just need to log in with a username and password. For the latter, you also need a password, but one associated with the paper, not with you, so every time someone submits a paper to arXiv, they get an individual paper password that they are expected to personally share with the authors of the paper.

All in all, the process looks like this: you get an email from the submitter of your paper containing the password for that paper. Then you go sign up for an arXiv account if you don’t already have one. Once you’ve done that, you go to your arXiv account page and look for the “claim ownership” link at the bottom. That lets you enter a paper identifier and its associated password, which will link your arXiv member account to the author account with the corresponding name on the paper.