Back when I first signed up for arXiv, I posted an explanation of their moderately complicated (but not really) system of identifying authors. So now that I have another paper up, and this time I’m the one submitting it, I thought I might as well put together an explanation of how that process works. So if you’ve ever wondered what is involved in submitting to the arXiv, read on!

1. As the first step, if you don’t already have an account on arXiv, you have to create one. Once you do that, you start the submission process by going from your arXiv profile page, which looks like this:

   Clicking START NEW SUBMISSION brings you to the beginning of the submission form.

   arXiv will ask you to verify that your email address and affiliation are correct (if they’re not, you go back to the profile page and change them, then you can restart the submission). It’ll also ask if you’re submitting as an author (the usual case) or non-author. Then you have to select a license. Normally the default option is the one to go with, because if you are going to be submitting this paper …

Big news out of the CTEQ school tonight: we discovered that the various Twitter feeds which announce new arXiv papers only show you the title of the paper, not the author — not until you click on the link, anyway. So here’s a neat way to have fun at parties: someone who has a smartphone (or tablet) with a Twitter app brings up one of the aforementioned feeds, like HEPExperPapers, picks a paper title, and everyone tries to guess who the authors are, or at least which research group or institution is behind it. Anything with \(\sqrt{s} = \unit{7}{\tera\electronvolt}\) doesn’t count. Converting this into a drinking game is easy, you just drink every time you get it wrong. (i.e. every time) Or every time you get it right. (i.e. never) Or just have a beer in hand. I’m sure that’s within the error bars.

Oh, and for the record: one of the people behind this brilliant idea happens to be the chair of a major university’s physics department.

As I posted yesterday, I now have a paper (and an account) on arXiv. No, the point of this post is not to gloat (which wouldn’t make any sense because half the people I know already have their own papers out, and the other half are making productive contributions to society). Somehow, I always looked at the process of being “inducted” to arXiv as a big mystery, but it’s really not. I thought I’d explain how the process works.

For starters, there are two ways a person can be associated with arXiv: as a member, or as an author of a preprint. You get a “member account” by simply signing up using the “register” button on the login page. They will ask you for an institutional affiliation, which reflects the fact that the site is designed for academics, but technically anyone can sign up. Then again, there’s no reason to sign up for the site as a “random person”; the only thing your account allows you to do is submit papers, once you get approved as an author.

Becoming an author, on the other hand, doesn’t actually require any involvement on your part. When a …